I was struck by how many of the justices seemed to pretend they had no idea how the American system of government works, where some States would interpret things one way and other might not, and it's kinda their job to sort out the differences. It's impossible to believe they _don't_ understand that, so I figured they had hidden motive for bringing those questions up that will become clear in the decision. I didn't take it at face value, because to do so would be to admit the Justices have no business in that job (even the 3 justices we heretofore assumed were sane).